Bridgestone Turanza Er33 235 45 R18 94y Review
The Bridgestone Turanza ER33 is a Premium Touring Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.
Tyre Reviews
- Sad, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Bridgestone Turanza ER33
| Size | Fuel | Wet | Noise | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 205/55 R16 91V | E | C | 71 | nine.09kgs |
| 205/60 R16 92V | C | C | 69 | 9.52kgs |
| 215/45 R17 87W | E | C | 69 | 9.65kgs |
| 225/45 R17 91W | Eastward | C | lxx | 11.74kgs |
| 215/50 R17 91V | E | C | 68 | ten.51kgs |
| 225/50 R17 94W | E | C | 71 | 10.38kgs |
| 255/35 R18 90Y | F | C | 71 | 12.26kgs |
| 225/40 R18 88Y | F | C | 70 | 10.93kgs |
| 225/40 R18 88Y | Due east | C | 71 | 10.73kgs |
| 245/40 R18 93Y | F | C | 71 | 12.74kgs |
| 245/40 R18 93Y | F | C | 71 | 12.74kgs |
| 235/45 R18 94Y | E | B | seventy | eleven.82kgs |
| 235/45 R18 94Y | E | B | seventy | 11.86kgs |
| 235/45 R18 94Y | Eastward | B | lxx | 11.82kgs |
| 235/45 R18 94Y | Due east | B | 70 | 11.86kgs |
| 245/45 R18 96W | F | C | 71 | 12.73kgs |
| 235/50 R18 97W | E | C | 71 | thirteen.15kgs |
| 245/45 R19 102Y Twoscore | E | C | 72 | xiii.01kgs |
| 245/45 R19 98Y | East | C | 71 | 13.53kgs |
| 245/45 R19 98Y | Due east | C | 71 | 13.53kgs |
| 245/45 R19 102Y XL | E | C | 71 | 13.53kgs |
| 245/45 R19 98Y | E | C | 71 | 13.53kgs |
Sorry, nosotros don't currently have any questions and answers for the Bridgestone Turanza ER33. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the course beneath!
Ask a question
We will never publish or share your electronic mail address
Superlative iii Bridgestone Turanza ER33 Reviews
Given eighty% while driving a BMW 320d (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 25,000 easy going miles
Good in dry, not and so skillful in wet. Last forever!
Given 70% while driving a Lexus GS 250 Luxury (235/45 R18) on a combination of roads for seven,000 average miles
These are really average tyres because they are bespoke Lexus tyres.
They lack whatsoever true feeling of conviction or comfort and whilst they are a touring rather than sporty tyre, they fail to inspire in whatsoever department other than article of clothing.
In my opinion they are not doing the auto justice and as soon equally the weather turns cold they bluntly become very unpredictable, about dangerous....hence the decision to invest in a ready of wintertime boots
Given 53% while driving a Toyota Camry (215/55 R17 H) on a combination of roads for nine,000 spirited miles
ER33 are fitted on Lexus and Premium JDM Toyotas in Asia..these are the worst tires e'er, i cannot however believe these tires are standard on Lexus IS, ES and JDM camrys..its pretty wobbly during cornering, its very unresponsive during high speed..planning to get Hankook S1 Noble 2 which are standard on Benz and BMW in europe/asia...
Latest Bridgestone Turanza ER33 Reviews
Given 63% while driving a Honda Civic (215/50 R17) on a combination of roads for 10,000 spirited miles
Very very noisy tyres. I would never buy them again. Otherwise, they are sub mediocre wet and dry.
Given 69% while driving a Mazda 121 (205/60 R16) on a combination of roads for 15,500 average miles
25,000 kms on them. 2018 Mazda 3 sport. The side walls are lovely & stiff & the grip will let become well before the walls plummet. The braking has ever been reliable except in the wet. That is tropical thunderstorm type of moisture. Kept the pressures at the manufactures recommendations & getting corking wear. The part I like about them is having an suv upwards 'ya rear going into a roundabout. A quick feed on the go pedal & you lot are around reliably while the bloke behind has got an arm full of bicycle trying not to crash. They don't tail gate any more. The hotter the route surface the more grip I accept found. They are noisy on class road chip just ok on hot mix. Withal lots of tread left so I am guessing a change at 50K. After a long run they are not hot at all. Will buy again.
Desire the best Performance summer tyre? Click here!
Given 69% while driving a Toyota Toyota Yaris XP150 (195/50 R16) on a combination of roads for 27,000 average miles
Tires lasted for 44000km ~ 3.v years in mixed driving on SEA climate. Replaced because the safety limit grooves are level with contact patch. Grip levels on dry out condition is nifty, and on wet they're adequate. It tin handle a bit of a spirited driving, doing slight slaloms without losing grip. Tire comfort however, is lacking. They generated a lot of noise and bumps aren't well damped.
Given 58% while driving a Cadillac ATS4 (225/45 R17) on by and large motorways for 18,000 spirited miles
The master selling signal for these tires is the long-lasting tread. Apart from that, it is poor less than average at everything else. The treatment is not adept at all; information technology loses grip suddenly at corners (not progressive at all). I have had meliorate handling with much cheaper brands. Motel noise is also very annoying. Tried many different pressure levels, simply all yielded the same.
Given 53% while driving a Honda Civic 1.6i VTEC Eco (205/55 R16) on mostly boondocks for 32,000 average miles
Came stock with my 2018 Civic Eco now nearly on 60k km with aforementioned tyres rotated at 25k for once sturdy as hell I think I can have another 10k more than and ok grip on dry but very mediocre on all other things especially wet I actually don't know why Honda cull it maybe Bridgestone wasn't able to sell them off the shelf then they've decided to eradicate their stocks by providing them as oem.
Given 60% while driving a Honda Jazz (195/50 R16) on generally town for 30,000 boilerplate miles
Drive about thirty.000 km and it starts losing it's pattern. It feels very bad at moisture road, I'm non brave to drive information technology higher up 90km/h at rain condition. The grip and treatment is good at dry out route, merely it's very noisy.
Given xc% while driving a Mazda 3 Series (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 55,659 spirited miles
Completed 50,000kms in Mazda three Max Sport 2017, Auto, neat handling car improved farther with these tyres. Comfort is extremely good, no issue with either wet weather condition braking or handling unless you push the motorcar across the prevailing road conditions.I live in Queensland Australia, semi-tropical region some 18okm's from Brisbane. Route surfaces off the freeways are class rock scrap on bitumen, which results in a form ride, yet, these tyres perform much better in terms of noise transmission and treatment than the standard OE Dunlops fitted on our second car, a 2018 Corolla. Bridgestone accept the knack in engineering a good production with swell clothing resistance, combined with higher up-average wet handling characteristics. I removed the route tyres off a new Hilux SR5 and replaced them with the Dualer 697's, they are the best value AT tyres on the market. I got 85,000Kms from these fitted on my Prado.
Given lxxx% while driving a Mazda 6 (205/lx R16 V) on for 48,000 miles
Very long lasting tyres. A pair were fitted to rear of my motorcar for one summer, and so moved to the front (and new tyres fitted to rear). They lasted some other three summers on forepart, so did effectually 48,000 miles in full. However had ii.8mm tread remaining but edges were worn, and they no longer felt secure on moisture roundabouts etc. I remember they were quieter than the Pirelli P7's I replaced them with.
Given 83% while driving a Mazda 6 (205/60 R16 V) on a combination of roads for 48,000 like shooting fish in a barrel going miles
Very long lasting tyres. Had a pair fitted to rear for one summer and moved them to front for next three summers, they did around 48,000 miles in total. All the same had 2.8mm tread remaining in primary grooves just both edges were visually worn, so I decided to replace. In the last few months they felt strange when taking sharp turns in the wet (like side walls were flexing more, perhaps this was the worn edges), and would occasionally wheelspin when setting off on common cold wet junctions, but no problems braking etc, and fine when dry. Please note that I generally don't drive fast and then perhaps not the best judge of tyres, and can't comment about wintertime functioning because I fit winter tyres Nov to Apr.
Given 47% while driving a Toyota Prius (205/60 R16 H) on a combination of roads for vi,000 average miles
These tyres came fitted to a Toyota Prius Plus (7 seater) and were six-months quondam when I bought the machine. They looked like new. In the dry out they have good grip merely the first fourth dimension I went out in the wet it was a different matter. The drive wheels spun at a junction with the car being driven in eco-mode. At that place was no pressure from traffic and it was a slightly uphill junction. I started to pull away and they just spun. I then went onto a pike (in the pelting the same day) and the auto started to brake automatically when the traffic in front end started to slow down (active cruise control). The automobile did not slow downwards only merely slid towards the machine in front. Pumping the brakes to go rid of the water under the tyres worked and no accident occurred. On the next motorway the same thing happened and again I managed by the pare of my teeth not to crash. Both hydroplaning incidents happened at 70mph on skillful road surfaces. Then, in the dry out the grip well but in the wet they are prone to being lethal. I am not a fast driver, who pushes the limits. I stick to the speed limits and endeavour to maximise the MPG whilst making progress. I have ordered some 4-season tyres to supersede them and I cannot await to get the Bridgestone tyres off my car.
Given 71% while driving a Mercedes Benz 190 2.3 16 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 boilerplate miles
No problems on the dry. Hydroplaned a couple of times on the moisture. Got 40k kilometres out of it. Volition buy another 4 today to replace the old ones. Peachy for 300kms a day bulldoze doing light courier work.
Given 56% while driving a Toyota Yaris (195/50 R16) on a combination of roads for 26,000 average miles
This is the factory fitted tyre for Toyota Yaris Indonesian marketplace. The dry grip is just average, yet good going 100mph on highway simply the moisture grip is simply terrible. I had multiple hydroplanning with just driving 40mph. Going just in a higher place 60mph into pool will instantly transform your car to gunkhole. The tread didnt lose half of its thickness in near 2 years with 26k miles on the clock which give depression wear rate.
Source: https://www.tyrereviews.com/Tyre/Bridgestone/Turanza-ER33.htm
0 Response to "Bridgestone Turanza Er33 235 45 R18 94y Review"
Post a Comment